airliner in earnest Wednesday , with counterterrorism experts saying
the focus should be on whether security measures are enough to detect
and disrupt future attacks.
“This guy should have been caught,” said Amos Guiora , a law professor at the
Nearly four weeks after the alleged
committees are to hold hearings Wednesday to begin asking that question
and more, such as how Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was allowed on the
aircraft despite intelligence linking him to a
one of the panels meeting Wednesday — will look not only at security
procedures but information-sharing among various intelligence and
security agencies, as well as whether the system for drawing up watch
lists of terrorism suspects is strong enough.
“Clearly, some elements of our homeland defenses are not working as we need them to be,” said Sen.
“Is this a test run or was this it?” said Riedel, now with the
Senators have called some of Obama’s top
intelligence and national security advisers — among them National
Intelligence Director
Abdulmutallab’s father had earlier contacted U.S.
officials to warn them his son may have joined with extremists, but he
was not placed on a no-fly list. And despite the fact he was traveling
without bags — or a coat — to
“My 13-year-old child knows enough not to let this guy on the plane,” Guiora said.
Guiora said airport security needs to become less
machine-based and concentrate more on putting trained experts in a
position to observe fliers.
—
(c) 2010, Detroit Free Press.
Visit the Freep, the World Wide Web site of the
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.