Home / Articles / Special Sections / Vote 2011 /  Vote 2011: Vote yes on Proposition 103
. . . . . . .
Give Through iGivefirst
Thursday, October 6,2011

Vote 2011: Vote yes on Proposition 103

By Boulder Weekly Staff

Here´s the long and short of it:

The State of Colorado is broke, and something must be done.

A study released by University of Denver researchers in September predicts that the state’s current funding gap will eventually consume the budget across the board. By 2025, the money in the state’s general fund won’t even cover Medicaid, prisons and schools.

In an effort to prevent our budget woes from further damaging education in Colorado, Sen. Rollie Heath gathered signatures for an initiative that would

increase state taxes for five years and set that money aside for education.

If passed, Proposition 103 would raise the state income tax from 4.63 percent to 5 percent and the state sales tax from 2.9 percent to 3 percent, returning them to 1999 levels for five years. The revenue generated — an estimated $3 billion — would go toward funding education in Colorado. (For an in-depth look at the budget and Proposition 103, see “Sinking ship,” cover story, Sept. 15.)

Proposition 103 is the latest attempt to deal with Colorado’s worsening state budget crisis, which has been exacerbated by the combined impact of the Gallagher Amendment, Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) and Amendment 23, which together result in less revenue in the state’s general fund.

Those who oppose Proposition 103 fear an increase in taxes will hurt the state’s economic recovery.

But the problem in our state is severe enough that something must be done now. The DU study shows that Colorado cannot grow out of this budget crisis, nor can we cut enough from the budget to solve the problem. Some rural districts in Colorado have already had to cut back to four days of school a week — not the direction Coloradans need to go if we want our children to compete for jobs in a global economy. If we can’t compete for jobs, we can’t compete economically. Education is inexorably tied to economic growth.

Will Proposition 103 solve the state’s budget problems? Hell, no. But it does buy five years of decreased cuts, enabling schools to maintain current offerings and perhaps regain some lost funding. This means kids who are receiving a diminished education as a result of recent budget cuts will get help while we try to solve our state’s bigger problem.

Boulder Weekly strongly urges a YES vote on Proposition 103.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No Registration Required

I'll post more later, here is a link to the opponents site:  http://savecoloradojobs.org/

I'll note that per pupil spending, adjusted for inflaton, has been rising a long time (without apparent benefit). Large amounts of waste have accumulated, and if you never ask them to spend money efficiently they never will. This is about allowing them to get away with wasteful spending since they can cry "its for the chidren" and people don't bother using the critical thinking skills they should have learned in school but just gullibly keep handing the government more money every year. In conrast to constantly rising governmetn costs, computers get cheaper and/or perform better each year because competition fores them to learn. Stop wasting money and ask government bureacrats to learn for once.


 In a new Issue Paper, authors Barry Poulson and John Merrifield show that the Prop 103 tax increase will kill over 11,000 jobs and cost each household $2,700. Don't be fooled by the underestimated costs by tax hikers, Prop 103 will cost Coloradans much more, here:


A Denver Post oped column: http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_19012508

"Proposition 103 is about more money for the teachers union"