Contact Us Advertising Information Online exclusives Cover Story Buzz Feature In Case You Missed It Vote 2009 Boulderganic Fall 2009 Student Guide 2009 Boulder Weekly Sweet 16 Anniversary Boulderganic 2009 Summer Scene 2009 Email Newsletter Legal Services Best of Boulder 2009 Annual Manual 2009 Newspaper of the Future Kids Camp Guide 2009 Wedding Marketplace 09 Jobs available Student Guide 2008 Best of Boulder 2008 Annual Manual 2008 Join Our Mailing List
|
March 12-18, 2009 buzz@boulderweekly.com
•All along the Watchman by Michael Phillips
•Acts of defiance by Rafer Guzmán
All along the Watchmen by Michael Phillips
Talk all you want about the dense novelistic embroidery of the graphic novel Watchmen, its obsessive detail and clever subversion of superhero mythology and masked avenger cliché. But really, the appeal of the film version, such as it is, relates almost entirely to eye-for-an-eye, severed-limb-for-a-limb vengeance, two hours and 41 minutes of it, with just enough solemnity to make anyone who thought The Dark Knight was a little gassy think twice about which superhero myth they’re calling gassy.
Example: child molestation. Watchmen, like Sin City before it, relishes the specter of child molestation as a dramatic device, because once you’ve established a subhuman predator you can have someone like Rorschach in Watchmen ram an ax blade into a man’s cranium in close-up, several times, over and over, and it’s OK because he’s vermin, and we’ve already seen two junkyard dogs fighting over the girl’s severed leg. The audience drools for justice, and while Rorschach is meant to be a psychopath, he’s our psychopath, one of a group of forcibly retired masked crimefighters uneasily reunited to save the world, and to save themselves from the person targeting them for extinction.
I was late to the 1984 graphic novel by Alan Moore (who has disowned the film; he’s like that). On the page it really is something: an unruly, meticulously cruddy depiction of a world teetering on the edge of apocalypse, plus side trips to Mars. You’ve heard of the Fantastic Four. Here are the Psychosexually Messed-Up and Pathologically Brutal Six.
Zack Snyder’s bloated screen adaptation will go over best with fanboys, fangirls, fanmen and fanwomen who give high marks for slavish fidelity to the source material. A few things didn’t make the cut (the pirate stuff, some of the conspiracy jazz), and the ending’s been futzed with, but the screen Watchmen apes the pictorial style and many of the individual panels of illustrator Dave Gibbons’ work. The only part of the movie that feels like an addition, rather than a recycling, is the prologue (scored, all too predictably, to Dylan’s “The Times They Are A-Changin’”), establishing this alternate-20th-century universe, populated by a select group of masked avengers riding high one decade, shut away the next, and by Nixon, yet.
In this universe America wins the war in Vietnam with the help of Dr. Manhattan, the most outre, superpowered and Spocklike of the Watchmen, an irradiated result of a government program gone haywire. He’s played by Billy Crudup, barely there underneath all the motion-capture digitized effects. He glows, can bend space and time, and glides through the picture like a nude one-man edition of Blue Man Group.
The film takes its sweet time setting up everyone’s massive chunks of back-story. The mystery at the heart of Watchmen has to do with who’s killing off the old gang, beginning with the most unsavory of the lot, The Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan). Well, it’s a tie, actually: Rorschach, played by Jackie Earle Haley, is the most unsavory, and most efficiently murderous. The comparatively clean-cut Watchmen are Nite Owl (Patrick Wilson) and his squeeze Silk Spectre II, played by Malin Akerman, possibly the worst actress in Hollywood at the moment. “Oh my God I’m on Mars!” she valley-girls at one interplanetary juncture.
Haley, practically alone among his cohorts, conveys a vivid sense of engagement. Too many of his fellow performers barely register. An exception is Carla Gugino, who plays the original Silk Spectre, a retired masked avenger herself. She’s such a good actress, in addition to fulfilling the specific demands of her outfits, and yet it’s depressing to see her redeem what she can in Watchmen as she did in Sin City, amid the self-righteous sleaze. The brutality is pretty numbing in Watchmen, and while the graphic novel poured it on as well, Snyder’s a lunkhead and a lingerer when it comes to using that violence for storytelling purposes.
We’re supposed to be wrestling with moral conundrums throughout Watchmen, as the weakest and most sociopathic of the protectors incinerate and destroy for the good of humankind. But the film’s dour viciousness is a lot less inventive than the graphic novel’s. The tone is set at the beginning (as it was on the page) by Rorschach’s journal, in which he cranks off on “all those liberals and intellectuals and smooth talkers” who have wrecked the nation. You wonder if Rush Limbaugh is starring in a remake of Taxi Driver. And you wonder if Snyder, whose earlier graphic novel adaptation, 300, was more engaging than this fetid item, will ever learn to imagine his own brand of cinematic miseries, rather than plunking someone else’s on the screen. —MCT back to top
Acts of defiance by Rafer Guzmán
A true-life story, a family drama, an epic tale of war — Defiance aims to be an all-in-one movie.
Director Edward Zwick (Glory, The Last Samurai) knows how to turn history into Hollywood entertainment, but with this story of three Jewish brothers who led a resistance group during World War II, he goes for grit as much as gloss. Defiance comes alive in its quieter scenes and smaller details.
The film opens in 1941 in Belarus and quickly dives into its story: Two ne’er-do-well brothers, Tuvia and Zus Bielski (Daniel Craig and Liev Schreiber, respectively), return home to find their father murdered by Nazis and their younger brother, Asael ( Jamie Bell), hiding under the floorboards. Together they flee to the woods, a place they know well. (The script, based on Nechama Tec’s book, hints that the older Bielskis spent some time there avoiding the law.) Soon they’re taking in other stragglers, and, person by person, the partisan force known as the Bielski Otriad is born.
Their group grows from camp to village to civilization, with a school, a hospital and ad hoc social conventions (the men take “forest wives”). But small fissures develop into dangerous rivalries, especially between the hotheaded Zus, who’s itching to spill Nazi blood, and the more levelheaded Tuvia, the camp’s de facto commander.
Defiance packs in a multitude of themes and story lines, and some get slighted. Tuvia’s transformation from coldhearted brute (one early scene, in which he avenges his father, is truly harrowing) into civic leader is only roughly sketched. And his relationship with Zus never quite comes into focus.
But Zwick keeps every ball in the air for more than two hours, and, in the end, Defiance, like its subjects, succeeds through sheer tenacity. —MCT Respond: letters@boulderweekly.com back to top
|
| |